Virelis reconstructs the movement of funds across the Stellar network — wallet by wallet, hop by hop — and writes it down in a document that balances to the cent and shows its working.
Books can agree with themselves and still be incomplete.
Most checks test whether the numbers match. We test whether anything is missing — because those are different questions, and only one of them catches the thing that ruins a case.
Every figure is traced to a named destination. If it doesn't balance, it isn't finished, and we don't publish drafts.
Nothing is trusted because one system produced it. Every finding is re-checked by an independent process that did not produce it.
Give us a wallet. We return a documented account you can follow transaction by transaction — what it did, where its funds came from, and where every unit of value ended up.
Funds followed forwards to their destination and backwards to their source, across as many hops as the trail takes — including movements a payment-level view alone does not show.
Money in, money out, money still held. Exact on-chain values, no rounding. The account is only complete when the total is fully accounted for and every remainder is explained.
Each wallet is assigned a class from a small, fixed vocabulary, decided by what the wallet does — never by who is assumed to control it. Behaviour first, always.
Every wallet gets its own standing record, versioned and cited. Findings are stated with their evidence attached, and corrected on the record when new evidence arrives.
Virelis runs entirely on hardware we control. No cloud processing, no third-party analytics platform, no external service holding a copy of your evidence.
That is an architectural decision, not a setting — and it is the reason chain-of-custody questions have a short answer.
Work is taken case by case, with terms agreed before any data is handled.
Documented tracing and reconciliation to support civil recovery, freezing applications and disclosure.
Independent reconstruction of a disputed flow of funds, written for people who have to defend the conclusion.
Behavioural analysis of counterparty wallets and the routes value travels before it reaches a deposit.
A full account of a multi-wallet scheme, reconciled end to end rather than sampled.
Consistent with the evidence. Never more than the evidence.
Virelis reports on-chain fact and behavioural pattern. We do not publish identities, and we do not assert conclusions that the chain alone cannot carry.
Findings that do not survive review are withdrawn on the record. Evidence that cuts against a theory is reported as plainly as evidence that supports it.
Describe the matter in outline — no case data in a first email. We will tell you honestly whether it is something Virelis can answer.
hellovirelis@pm.me